The draft plan to 2050 has about 25,000 homes to place and prefers towns with stations and services. Leighton Buzzard fits every test. Comments open 30 Nov.
Central Bedfordshire Council’s preferred plan for where new homes go up to 2050 favours towns that already have services and a railway station. Leighton Buzzard is one of only four large towns in the district that have both.
The council’s Executive meets on Tuesday 6 October to recommend the draft for public consultation. If Full Council agrees, residents can comment from 30 November 2026 to 18 January 2027. (Executive agenda, 6 October 2026)
No sites are chosen at this stage. What the draft sets is the strategy that sites will later be judged against, and the numbers behind it.
How many homes
The Government’s standard method gives Central Bedfordshire 2,199 homes a year. Over 2025 to 2050 that is 54,975 homes. The council says that figure is set nationally and is not open to consultation. (Executive report, paragraph 13)
About 30,000 of those are already covered by sites in the current Local Plan, by planning permissions or by homes already built. That leaves around 25,000 for the new plan to find. The council says the number will move, because the standard method is recalculated every year and “is likely to increase”. The final figure will be in the next draft, due in October 2027. (Regulation 23 Local Plan, section 3.2)
The council will not go above that number. The draft says building more than the Government requires “is not an option we will be taking forward”. It gives three reasons:
- residents’ concern about infrastructure and the loss of rural character
- about 38% of the district is Green Belt
- other constraints, including the Chilterns National Landscape and flood risk
Where the council wants them
The draft sets out six broad options for where homes could go. It prefers a combination of two, backed by a third:
- Option 1: new homes where services and facilities already have capacity
- Option 2: new homes near existing and planned railway stations, including East West Rail
- Option 3, in support: growth where affordable housing is needed most, which the council says is largely the south of the district
Three options are rejected:
- sharing growth evenly between every town and village
- no Green Belt development at all
- only extending existing towns and villages, with no new settlements
The council’s own environmental assessment rated the station option as having the most positive effects, followed by the services option. It found the “share it evenly” option had the most negative effects. (Regulation 23 Local Plan, sections 3.4 to 3.6)
On Green Belt, the council says national policy now requires it to identify grey belt, meaning Green Belt land that contributes little to its purposes. It says its Green Belt review has found such land. The map showing where it is has not been added to the consultation draft yet: the document carries a placeholder saying it will follow once the Green Belt study is complete.
Why Leighton Buzzard fits every test
This section is our reading of the draft, set against its own tables.
The draft lists seven large towns in a new settlement hierarchy: Ampthill, Biggleswade, Dunstable, Flitwick, Houghton Regis, Leighton Buzzard and Sandy. Its Table 1 then lists what each one has.
| Large town | Railway station in Table 1 | Named for the most acute affordable housing need |
|---|---|---|
| Leighton Buzzard | Yes | Yes |
| Biggleswade | Yes | No |
| Flitwick | Yes | No |
| Sandy | Yes | No |
| Dunstable | No | Yes |
| Houghton Regis | No | Yes |
| Ampthill | No | No |
The affordable housing column comes from paragraph 6.4.5. It says the most acute need is in “southern areas of Central Bedfordshire including Dunstable, Leighton Buzzard and Houghton Regis”. Leighton Buzzard is the only one of those three with a station.
Table 1 also lists a full set of services for the town: nursery, primary and secondary schools, a GP, dentist, supermarket, leisure centre, post office, bank and library among them.
So on the council’s own evidence, Leighton Buzzard meets all three tests in the preferred strategy. That does not mean homes are coming to any particular field. Where they would go is decided later, through site assessment. In August, 51 sites in and around the town were put up for comment, including 149 hectares west of Linslade and 294 hectares at Heath and Reach. Our report on those sites lists them.
Jobs and Traveller sites
The draft also proposes more employment land than the needs assessment requires. The council says 80% of respondents backed that. It links the extra jobs to East West Rail, the proposed new town at Tempsford, Universal Studios and the Luton Airport expansion.
It sets a need for 592 Gypsy and Traveller pitches and 28 Travelling Showpeople plots over the plan period. Fifty pitches have been approved since April 2025. The council thinks another 156 pitches and six plots could come from existing sites. That leaves 386 pitches and 22 plots to allocate. The draft says putting them on large strategic sites “is likely to be the only way” to meet that need. (Regulation 23 Local Plan, section 4)
The timetable has slipped
When the site consultation ran in August, the council’s timetable put this second formal consultation between September and November 2026. It is now 30 November to 18 January, seven weeks. The Executive report says it must start in November to keep a new Local Plan on course for adoption by December 2028.
The stages from here:
- 6 October 2026: Executive recommends the draft to Full Council
- 30 November 2026 to 18 January 2027: public consultation, if Full Council agrees
- by the end of October 2026: a report on what the earlier scoping consultation said, which the council says it envisages publishing
- October 2027: the full draft Local Plan, with final housing numbers and sites, for a third consultation
- December 2028: target date for adoption
What it means for you
- Nothing to respond to yet. The consultation does not open until 30 November. The Executive meeting on 6 October is public and starts at 9.30am.
- The strategy is the thing to comment on this time. If you think new homes should or should not be concentrated near stations and existing services, this is the stage to say so. By October 2027 the strategy will largely be set and the argument will be about sites.
- Services matter as much as homes. The draft asks whether the town’s existing infrastructure can take more. If you know the GP, school or roads cannot, that is evidence the council says it wants.
- Watch the grey belt map. It is not in the draft yet. When it appears, it will show which Green Belt land around the town the council considers weaker.
Our Leighton Buzzard planning news page has the background on the district’s housing land supply.
Sources
- Central Bedfordshire Council, Executive agenda for 6 October 2026, item 10.
- Central Bedfordshire Council, Executive report: Local Plan Regulation 23 Consultation, for the recommendations, the housing figures, the consultation dates and the adoption target.
- Central Bedfordshire Council, Appendix A: Regulation 23 Local Plan, for the housing options, Table 1, the settlement hierarchy, paragraph 6.4.5 on affordable housing need, the Gypsy and Traveller figures and the timetable.
Have your say